Hemant Sethi NCLT: 924 Cases, 98.92% Win Rate India

# Hemant Sethi NCLT: 924 Cases, 98.92% Win Rate India Hemant Sethi has won 914 of 924 verified NCLT cases — a 98.92% raw win rate, the highest in the Maharashtra court record. But 86% of those cases had no opposing lawyer. When respondents were represented, his win rate was 88.81%, near the tribunal's court-wide average of 88.09%. The gap between these two figures reveals how NCLT's structure shapes lawyer win rates at scale.

The Two Numbers You Need to Know

Every discussion of Hemant Sethi's NCLT record starts with 98.92%. That is a real number: 914 wins from 924 verified cases at India's National Company Law Tribunal. The second number is 88.81%. That is Sethi's win rate when the opposing party appeared with a lawyer — in 134 of his 952 total cases (14.08%) where someone actually contested the matter. Both figures are accurate. The distance between them tells you how NCLT actually works.

Why NCLT Win Rates Run High

India's National Company Law Tribunal handles insolvency petitions, winding-up applications, and corporate disputes under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. In a large share of these matters, the respondent — typically a company that has defaulted — has no practical incentive or financial capacity to contest the petition. Across all 7,531 tracked NCLT cases, only 16.39% of respondents appear with legal counsel. The tribunal proceeds ex parte in most of the remaining cases and ordinarily rules in favour of the petitioner. This is the structural context behind any NCLT lawyer's raw win rate. A petitioner-side specialist who files at scale will naturally accumulate a high headline number — not because they win unusually difficult arguments, but because most NCLT matters resolve without a fight.

Hemant Sethi's Record in Detail

Of his 935 cases with a noted side, Sethi appears as the complainant (petitioner) in 923. His practice is concentrated at a single tribunal: 924 of 952 total cases are at NCLT. He has five cases at the Bombay High Court (100% wins in those records) and eight at the Bombay High Court Civil Appellate side.

The Contested Win Rate in Context

Sethi's 88.81% contested win rate sits just above NCLT's court-wide complainant win rate of 88.09%. That is the correct reference point. The state average for all courts combined is 49.22% — but that figure spans criminal courts, family courts, and small-claims disputes. Comparing an NCLT specialist's win rate against a state-wide average distorts the picture. Within NCLT specifically, an 88.81% contested win rate means Sethi is performing at the tribunal's natural advantage level when he faces opposition. The raw 98.92% is explained almost entirely by the 85.92% of cases where no opposing counsel appeared.

The Two Judges Who Handle 85% of His Cases

Sethi's docket is concentrated on two benches: - **Ravikumar Duraisamy** — 502 of Sethi's 924 NCLT cases (54.3%). Tribunal-wide, Duraisamy has a 90.96% complainant win rate across 4,813 cases. - **V.P. Singh** — 288 cases (31.2%). Tribunal-wide: 91.57% complainant win rate across 1,080 cases. Together these two judges account for 790 of his 924 NCLT cases (85.5%). Both are among the tribunal's highest-volume benches and both lean strongly toward complainants in recorded outcomes — consistent with NCLT's overall pattern.

Case Duration: Insufficient Data for Comparison

Of 924 NCLT cases, only 16 have both a valid filing date and judgment date in the record. With a 1.7% coverage rate, no reliable average can be drawn and duration is excluded from the primary findings. The state-wide average for lawyer cases is 353 days; NCLT's own duration coverage is similarly sparse at 5.3% of cases.

Analysis

Sethi's record reflects a specialist practice of genuine depth: 924 cases at a single tribunal, concentrated before the two judges who together handle most of NCLT Mumbai's docket. That institutional familiarity and volume are real, verifiable qualities. The more precise picture comes from the contested-only rate. At 88.81% when opposed — near-identical to NCLT's 88.09% court-wide average — Sethi is not significantly outperforming the tribunal's natural petitioner advantage in hard-fought matters. The 98.92% raw rate is primarily a reflection of NCLT's structure: a tribunal where most respondents do not appear with counsel, where petitioner-side specialists file only documented default claims, and where the two judges handling the majority of the docket show 90%+ complainant win rates across their full records. For matters likely to be contested by a represented opposing party, 88.81% — not 98.92% — is the figure that describes Sethi's performance against genuine resistance. **What is Hemant Sethi's NCLT win rate?** Sethi has won 914 of 924 verified NCLT cases, a raw win rate of 98.92%. Of his 952 total cases, 134 (14.08%) were contested by an opposing lawyer; his win rate in those matters is 88.81%, compared to NCLT's court-wide complainant average of 88.09%.

Methodology

Win rates are calculated from court records covering Hemant Sethi's NCLT cases, analysed on 13 May 2026. "Contested" means the respondent was represented by a named, identified lawyer in the case record. Cases with null outcomes are excluded from rate calculations. Duration averages use only cases with both a valid filing and judgment date. Court-wide figures are drawn from the same dataset across all recorded outcomes for the NCLT Mumbai Bench.

Data Limitations

Duration data covers only 16 of 924 NCLT cases (1.7% coverage) — no reliable average can be drawn. The 8-case Bombay High Court Civil Appellate record is too small a sample for any meaningful conclusion on win rates. Contested-case count (134) is based on whether a respondent lawyer name is recorded; not recorded does not necessarily mean no representation was present at hearing.